Community:Rollback

The Rollback user right provides users with a button that will undo (revert) with a single click, the last edit to a given page, along with any consecutive previous edits made by the same editor to that page. It is used to undo problematic edits such as vandalism.

An editor with the rollback user rights will see a rollback button next to relevant revisions on pages such as their watchlist, user contributions pages and on pages edit history.

Rollback is enabled and available to all Administrators automatically and can be given to other users upon request, subject to the approval of an administrator. A user who has been assigned this right explicitly is called a rollbacker. There are currently 5 Administrators and 2 rollbackers, not including global rollbackers and stewards. Since rollback is part of the core administrator tools, an admin could be stripped of their administrative privileges entirely to remove those tools.

How it works
Users with rollback permission have extra "rollback" links next to revisions on the recent changes page, page histories, diffs, user contribution pages, and their watchlist.

Rules and limitations: Note that methods exist for performing rollback with non-generic edit summaries.
 * The rollback button only appears next to the most recent revision of a page.
 * If the page is edited again before you click the rollback link, you will get an error message instead.
 * You cannot choose which revision will be restored. It is always the last revision not made by the author of the most recent revision. This revision may be problematic too, so be careful.
 * If there are multiple consecutive edits to the page by the same author, they will all be reverted. To remove only some of them, you must revert the changes manually.
 * You cannot use rollback on a page which has only been edited by one person, as there would be nothing to revert to.
 * You cannot use rollback to restore a revision that has been deleted. Attempting to do so will display an error message.
 * Rollback happens immediately; there is no confirmation or preview (although a page is displayed allowing you to see the changes you have made).
 * Rollbacks are automatically marked as a "minor edit".

When to use rollback
Standard rollback is a fast way of undoing problematic edits, but it has the disadvantage that only a generic edit summary is generated, with no explanation of the reason for the change. For this reason, it is considered inappropriate to use it in situations where an explanatory edit summary would normally be expected. Rollback may be used: Use of standard rollback for any other purposes – such as reverting good-faith changes which you happen to disagree with – is likely to be considered misuse of the tool. When in doubt, use another method of reversion and supply an edit summary to explain your reasoning.
 * 1)  To revert obvious vandalism and other edits where the reason for reverting is absolutely clear
 * 2)  To revert edits in your own user pages
 * 3)  To revert edits that you have made (for example, edits that you accidentally made)
 * 4)  To revert edits by banned or blocked users in defiance of their block or ban (but be prepared to explain this use of rollback when asked to)
 * 5)  To revert widespread edits (by a misguided editor or malfunctioning bot) unhelpful to the wiki, provided that you supply an explanation in an appropriate location, such as at the relevant talk page

The above restrictions apply to standard rollback, using the generic edit summary. If a tool or manual method is used to add an appropriate explanatory edit summary, then rollback may be freely used as with any other method of revert.

As with other methods of reverting, when using rollback to restore text to a page, ensure that the text restored does not violate policies.

Administrators may revoke the rollback privilege or issue a block in response to a persistent failure to explain reverts, regardless of the means used. However, they should allow the editor an opportunity to explain their use of rollback before taking any action – there may be justification of which the administrator is not aware (such as reversion of a banned user). Similarly, editors who edit war may lose the privilege regardless of the means used to edit war. Administrators who persistently misuse rollback may have their administrator access revoked, although in practice such cases would require the intervention of the bureaucratic team.

Requesting rollback rights
To request rollback rights, ask at Community:Request for permissions/Rollbacker or ask one of the administrators. Any administrator may grant or revoke rollback rights, using the user rights page.

While there is no fixed requirement, a request is unlikely to be successful without a contribution history that demonstrates an ability to distinguish well-intentioned edits with minor issues from unconstructive vandalism. Rollback is not for very new users: it is unlikely that editors with under 20 edits will have their request granted. In addition, editors with a recent history of edit warring will often not be granted rollback given concerns of abuse through revert warring.

If you have been granted rollback rights and are not sure how it works, you may wish to test it out! Try on a test page under your username (https://sb-republic.fandom.com/wiki/User:YourNameHere/TestPage).

Accidental use of rollback
Because rollback only takes a single click, without asking for confirmation, even experienced users may sometimes accidentally click rollback when attempting to click somewhere else. If this occurs, simply revert your edit manually, with an edit summary like "Self-revert accidental use of rollback". You could even rollback the rollback, but this can cause confusion for others who look at the page history.

If rollback is used accidentally instead of undo to revert a good faith edit, you could take a quick look to see if there is anything in the article you could improve (like a typo) and while making that edit also add the reason for reversion. You could also explain the reason for reversion on the talk page of the user who made the edit or the article talk page if appropriate. Alternatively you can follow the rollback with a dummy edit, with an edit summary like "Accidental use of rollback – reason for reversion".